EU AI Act Art.71: EU database for high-risk AI systems
Article 71 of the EU AI Act binds the operator (see the article). It requires The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, shall set up and maintain an EU database for high-risk AI systems. This page states what it requires, who it binds and the evidence to keep. Browsing is free; the conformance kit is USD 499.
Specifics
| Instrument | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the EU AI Act), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 |
|---|---|
| Article | Art.71 |
| Binds | Operator (see the article) |
| Group | Governance and EU Database |
| Evidence items | 2 |
| Linked NIST AI RMF controls | 0 |
| Linked ISO/IEC 42001 controls | 0 |
| Last updated |
Who does Art.71 bind?
The article binds the operator (see the article). The Act places each duty on a named party in the value chain, so a system can carry a provider duty and a deployer duty at once. Confirm your own position against the text; this page names the party, it does not rule on your facts.
Applies with the high-risk regime: 2 December 2027 for stand-alone systems listed in Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in regulated products listed in Annex I (Article 113, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744). See the full timeline.
What does Art.71 require?
The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, shall set up and maintain an EU database for high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III; providers (and where applicable deployers from the public sector) shall register the systems and provide the information set out in Annex VIII.
This is our plain-language statement of the article, not the text of the regulation. Read the article: Art.71 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on EUR-Lex).
What evidence should we keep for Art.71?
| Category | Evidence to keep |
|---|---|
| Registration | EU-database registration entries per high-risk AI system |
| Registration | Annex VIII information completeness |
What does a linked control mean here?
A linked control is a NIST AI RMF or ISO/IEC 42001 control that the held rule set records as a topical match, with a confidence and a one-line reason. It does not establish that meeting one requirement satisfies the other, it is not legal advice, and it is not certification. Where no control is recorded, the page says so and does not guess. Sources: the NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.
Which NIST AI RMF controls line up with Art.71?
No NIST AI RMF control is recorded as a match for this obligation in the held rule set. It is left unlinked and marked, never guessed.
Which ISO/IEC 42001 controls line up with Art.71?
No ISO/IEC 42001 control is recorded as a match for this obligation in the held rule set. It is left unlinked and marked, never guessed.
What does the conformance kit add for Art.71?
The kit renders this obligation into your own role checklist with the evidence register, the linked controls and a CSV export, for USD 499 one off. See what is in the kit or open it.